Thesis Paper Dataset
Entrepreneurship Paper Fit Calculator
Loads the starter dataset from papers.json, autosaves working edits in browser storage, and exports the modified dataset as JSON.
Weighted score
4.61 / 5
Category
core
Decision
Use as a central paper for the thesis.
Manual screening status
Use this to hide papers you have already reviewed without deleting them from the database.
{
"paper_id": "P001",
"title": "Breaking boundaries to creatively generate value: The role of resourcefulness in entrepreneurship",
"authors": [
"Trenton Alma Williams",
"Eric Yanfei Zhao",
"Scott Sonenshein",
"Deniz Ucbasaran",
"Gerard George"
],
"year": 2021,
"journal": "Journal of Business Venturing",
"doi": "10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106141",
"url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902621000513",
"paper_role": "theory foundation",
"paper_type": "conceptual",
"context": "general entrepreneurship; entrepreneurial resourcefulness; value creation under resource constraints",
"main_topic": "entrepreneurial resourcefulness",
"research_question_or_purpose": "To explain the role of resourcefulness in entrepreneurship and outline how entrepreneurs creatively generate value under constraints.",
"abstract": "Entrepreneurial resourcefulness is a concept that resonates with practitioners and scholars alike from a diverse set of theoretical and empirical backgrounds. Despite the prevalence and promise of this concept, the literature on entrepreneurial resourcefulness is fragmented and lacks cohesion in how it is labeled, conceptualized, measured, and deployed. In many cases, it appears that bringing resources to bear for entrepreneurial purposes is taken for granted, which limits theoretical development of if and how ventures emerge and grow. In this editorial, we explore the theoretical underpinnings of resourcefulness, offer a definition, and provide a roadmap for future scholarship. In addition, we introduce the six articles that comprise the Special Issue on entrepreneurial resourcefulness, discuss their contributions, and explore how they relate to our overall perspective on resources and resourcefulness. It is our hope that this Special Issue will mobilize additional scholarship to enhance our knowledge on resourcefulness, which we view as a fundamental part of entrepreneurship.",
"introduction": "",
"introduction_key_points": [
"Entrepreneurial resourcefulness is treated as a fundamental part of entrepreneurship.",
"The literature on resourcefulness is fragmented and lacks conceptual cohesion.",
"The paper positions resourcefulness as relevant for understanding how ventures emerge and grow.",
"The article offers theoretical grounding and a research agenda.",
"For the thesis, this paper can help justify freelancers as entrepreneurial actors who create value under resource constraints."
],
"theories_or_concepts": [
"entrepreneurial resourcefulness",
"resource constraints",
"creative value generation",
"resource deployment",
"boundary-breaking behavior"
],
"method": "conceptual",
"sample_or_data": "not empirical",
"independent_variables": [],
"dependent_variables": [],
"moderators_mediators": [],
"key_findings": "Resourcefulness helps explain how entrepreneurs creatively mobilize and deploy available resources to create value under constraints.",
"fit_scores": {
"entrepreneurship_relevance": 5,
"freelance_or_independent_work_relevance": 5,
"digital_platform_or_market_relevance": 4,
"theory_development_value": 5,
"construct_variable_value": 5,
"method_measurement_value": 4,
"success_outcome_value": 4,
"self_presentation_or_signaling_value": 4,
"source_quality": 5
},
"weighted_score_0_5": 4.61,
"selection_category": "core",
"selection_decision": "Use as a central paper for the thesis.",
"best_use_in_thesis": "Use as a theory-foundation paper to support the idea that entrepreneurs, including possible digital freelancers, create value by mobilizing limited resources under constraints.",
"notes": "This paper should not be judged only by direct platform or freelancer fit. In the exploratory phase, it is useful because it helps build the broader entrepreneurship logic around resourcefulness, constraint, and value creation. It may become more important if resourcefulness, resource constraints, or competitive differentiation become part of the final thesis framework.",
"weights": {
"entrepreneurship_relevance": 0.15,
"freelance_or_independent_work_relevance": 0.13,
"digital_platform_or_market_relevance": 0.12,
"theory_development_value": 0.15,
"construct_variable_value": 0.13,
"method_measurement_value": 0.12,
"success_outcome_value": 0.08,
"self_presentation_or_signaling_value": 0.07,
"source_quality": 0.05
},
"manual_relevance_label": "core",
"original_fit_scores_before_manual_input": {
"entrepreneurship_relevance": 5,
"freelance_or_independent_work_relevance": 2,
"digital_platform_or_market_relevance": 1,
"theory_development_value": 5,
"construct_variable_value": 3,
"method_measurement_value": 1,
"success_outcome_value": 2,
"self_presentation_or_signaling_value": 2,
"source_quality": 5
},
"fit_score_calibration_method": "manual core anchor: confirmed core papers raised to strong thesis-fit scores",
"manual_review_status": "checked",
"active_screening": false,
"review_notes": "Manually reviewed and selected as a core concept paper for the thesis."
}Ranking analytics
Paper scoring structure
These charts show how the papers are ranked, how many papers fall into each selection category, and why the currently selected paper receives its score.
Selection drivers
Criteria ranked by correlation with the final weighted score.
Pearson r
Pearson r interpretation
0.70 to 1.00 = very strong positive association
0.50 to 0.69 = strong positive association
0.30 to 0.49 = moderate positive association
0.10 to 0.29 = weak positive association
Below 0 = negative association
Current reading
The strongest positive driver is Constructs with r = 0.845. This means papers strong on this criterion tend to receive higher final rankings.
The weakest or most negative driver is Quality with r = 0.548. A weak or negative value does not mean the criterion is unimportant; it means it does not explain much variation in the final ranking.
Strongest positive drivers
#1
Constructs
r = 0.845 · very strong
#2
Freelance
r = 0.805 · very strong
#3
Signaling
r = 0.755 · very strong
A higher positive value means that papers scoring high on that criterion also tend to receive higher final weighted scores.
Because your final score is calculated from these criteria, this chart should be read as a ranking-structure diagnostic, not as causal evidence.
Selected paper breakdown
P001 · 4.61 / 5 · core
Breaking boundaries to creatively generate value: The role of resourcefulness in entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship
5 / 5
Freelance
5 / 5
Platform
4 / 5
Theory
5 / 5
Constructs
5 / 5
Method
4 / 5
Success
4 / 5
Signaling
4 / 5
Quality
5 / 5
Selection categories
Distribution of papers by final scoring category.
core
24 papers
keep
20 papers
maybe
33 papers